In a society where there is no common courtesy and the haves flaunt their ability to easily break the law as a badge of pride, there can be no justice.

If we want justice we should be willing to take it upon us to redeem ourselves, since the judges are also coming from amongst us.

The only reason there is so much demand on restoration of judges is that “Punjab” wants it or rather the Punjab only PML-N wants it and the electorate is going along with them.

This is not a definite version of definition but my interpreted opinion of term. Similarly, in our day to day upcoming engagements say on the start of a hectic day, we evaluate things accordingly and as per urgency, preference, priority and liabilities, so that we may effectively culminate the required task as self designed keeping the objectives as per said domains of above mentioned terms.

If I evaluate your version and interpret with above cited definition as opinion, I have no hesitation to disagree, on the level of your perception of interpreting the issue, as most urgent, preferred and demanding urgency.

System is an organized way of managing things. It is usually defined so to run organizations and institutions in a manner feasible to the runners and with a motive to implement, without element of annoyance and unforeseen event with effective thrust, minimizing any hindrance ,whatsoever ,being produced if at all ,as in this case PCO and respective extortionist .

Derangement in a smooth and effective system does not depend on individual but its structural anatomy that curtails by virtue of its architectural designs any such forces that may disrupt its existence in uniformity.

In addition to such strict structural architecture reinforcement it element such as qualification, background, merit, check and balances, and reputation are the key factors that are important in maintaining the credibility and essence of system.

Presence or absence of a person from the site and sights of such systemized institute never terminate in to turmoil of the institution.

In order to facilitate such authoritative systemized structure long term checks and balances, with intense scrutinizing built in tendency of system is required.

It is not that Mr. so and so will come and curtail as if he is the only field related expert .if he is that much credible and respected then the person may be put up for presidency appointment .

Please I have no reservation to the justice but the term has been used to float as an idea.

Now if I consider the present structural architecture of judicature as a system ,the final authoritative prerogative still lies in the hands of those that are qualified enough as main culprit from Mr. Musharraf to Farooq naik and what who ever .

Under such circumstances ,a change directed on the basis of ego ,prestige and one man show is only a piece of well wishes as forecast with no future prospects as it is not the judge that is a authority. It’s the system that is authoritative by virtue of its implementing power of the state.

In my opinion ,this subject of , urgency ,priority ,preference ,liability ,obligations ,long term benefit and merit ,should now get entrance as the main mass of desire and not directed on individuals EGO .

Basic issues are basic issues which demand urgent relief .nothing can be compromised on the theme of basic issues. Regard.